The only way to get “better at AI” is to use AI. The process is much like making music, the old way. Think of all the great bands of the past, from the Beatles to Pink Floyd to whomever. They would go onto a studio with not fully completed songs, but concepts. Then, they would jam, they would labor, they would collaborate, they would sometimes not use what they created, saving it perhaps for the next album. That, is the same with AI. The output does not appear instantly. It takes time.
The part about clients asking for one thing and the real problem being somewhere else feels very real. AI implementation seems less like prompting and more like diagnosis.
Exactly, in the end people that are telling you, that they sell ai solutions, are actually selling business solutions with a 5-25% ai.
In the end it always comes down to uncovering the client’s problem. And the problem is either marketing, sales or internal ops. So you could’ve solved it without ai 😂.
The only way to get “better at AI” is to use AI. The process is much like making music, the old way. Think of all the great bands of the past, from the Beatles to Pink Floyd to whomever. They would go onto a studio with not fully completed songs, but concepts. Then, they would jam, they would labor, they would collaborate, they would sometimes not use what they created, saving it perhaps for the next album. That, is the same with AI. The output does not appear instantly. It takes time.
Agreed 100% on it, John!
The part about clients asking for one thing and the real problem being somewhere else feels very real. AI implementation seems less like prompting and more like diagnosis.
Exactly, in the end people that are telling you, that they sell ai solutions, are actually selling business solutions with a 5-25% ai.
In the end it always comes down to uncovering the client’s problem. And the problem is either marketing, sales or internal ops. So you could’ve solved it without ai 😂.